[청랑 킬러문항] 2025 수능 영어 빈칸 문제 #33

아래 지문을 읽고 3분 내에 정답을 맞춰 댓글로 남겨보세요!

지문)

An influential critique of claims that inherited traits dictate social standing examines the history of measuring human intellect. In earlier periods, practitioners recorded skull dimensions to assert group differences, and later psychometric tests assigned a single number to cognitive ability. The author points out two central fallacies: reification—treating an abstract attribute as a concrete quantity—and ranking—assuming that complex mental capacities can be linearly ordered. Detailed historical examples reveal how selective reporting, methodological flaws, and cultural biases shaped these metrics to legitimize social hierarchies rather than uncover objective insights. By exposing measurement tools as instruments of prejudice, the text implies that ________________.

---

Vocabulary

reification	riːəfəˈkeɪʃən	구체화의 오류
determinism	dɪˈtɜːrmɪnɪzəm	결정론
pseudoscientific	suːdoʊsaɪənˈtɪfɪk	유사과학의
bias	baɪəs	편향
quantifiable	kwɒntɪˈfaɪəbəl	수량화할 수 있는

---

문제) What best completes the blank?

① measurement methods can eliminate cultural influences on intelligence
② complex human traits cannot be reduced to a single quantitative measure
③ historical data collection was free from social prejudice
④ ranking systems always yield fair comparisons
⑤ objective metrics are unaffected by who designs the test

 

정답과 해설은 매주 토요일 공개!

 

청랑 킬러문항이 더 궁금하다면?

[청랑 킬러문항] 2025 수능 영어 빈칸 문제 #32